3483625.00 RES-0001 3483625.00 3117847.31 selec-w TEN-0001 tenders 2 t-esubm 2 part-req 3 t-sme 0 t-med 0 t-small 0 t-micro 0 t-oth-eea 2 t-no-eea 0 t-verif-inad 0 t-no-verif 0 t-verif-inad-low 0 CON-0001 false false false LOT-0001 TEN-0001 false 3483625.00 no TPA-0001 LOT-0001 1 - 583864 CON-0001 2026-06-29+02:00 Cosylab, Ljubljana Ljubljana 1 TEN-0001 TPA-0001 ORG-0004 29 true http://www.fair-center.de ORG-0001 FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH Planckstr. 1 Darmstadt 64291 DE711 DEU DE 275 595 927 +49 6159 712034 sg227@gsi.de http://www.gsi.de ORG-0002 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Planckstraße 1 Darmstadt 64291 DE711 DEU DE 111 671 917 +49 6159712034 sg227@gsi.de https://www.bundeskartellamt.de ORG-0003 Vergabekammer des Bundes Villemomblerstr. 76 Bonn 53123 DEA22 DEU 022894990 Vergabekammer des Bundes +49 22894990 vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de false UBO-0001 http://www.cosylab.com large ORG-0004 Cosylab Gerbiceva 64 Ljubljana Ljubljana SI041 SVN SI55936768 +386 000 info@cosylab.com ORG-0005Datenservice Öffentlicher Einkauf (in Verantwortung des Beschaffungsamts des BMI)Bonn53119DEA22DEU0204:994-DOEVD-83+49228996100noreply.esender_hub@bescha.bund.de UBO-0001 SVN 00492140-2026135/20262026-07-16+02:00 2.3 eforms-sdk-1.13 eforms-sdk-1.13 0bb6c3aa-c42a-40cf-aa16-71a021b1d9e5 8c1b899d-6087-498d-a306-f711b21ffbf3 2026-07-15+02:00 11:30:49+02:00 01 2026-07-15+02:00 32014L0024 can-standard DEU pub-undert-cga education ORG-0001 ted-esenORG-0005 pub-undert-cga education ORG-0002 false false false no-eu-funds vgv The competent reviewing authority is Vergabekammer des Bundes [transl.: Federal Public Procurement Tribu-nal] Villemombler Straße 76 53123 Bonn Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Website: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html Candidate/ Bidder is requested to clearly identify those sections of the participa-tion application (and eventually of the tender, if applicable) that contain a trade or business secret. If Bidder fails to do so, the Public Procurement Tribunal may, in the case of a review procedure, assume that Bidder has agreed to have these documents inspected (§165 para. 3 GWB). As Awarding Authority, FAIR is obliged to make the tender file available to the Public Procurement Tribunal immediately when initiating a review procedure (§ 163 para. 2 cl. 3 GWB). Candidates/ Bidders have a right to expect the contracting authority's compliance with the Bidder-protecting provisions re: the tender procedure (§ 97 para. 6 GWB). If Candidate/ Bidder interested in the contract considers that Bidder's rights have been infringed through failure to comply with award regulations, the infringement must be reported to FAIR within ten calendar days (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 1 GWB). Infringements identifiable on the basis of the announcement or the award doc-uments must be asserted against FAIR within the deadline for submission of ap-plications (or tenders) specified in the announcement (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs Candidate/ Bidder that FAIR is unwilling to redress its complaint, it is possible to file an appeal for review with the aforementioned Public Procure-ment Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the notification (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 4 GWB). Bidders whose tenders are not to be considered for the award will be informed prior to the award according to § 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after this information has been sent by FAIR. In the case of trans-mission by fax or electronic means, this period shall be ten calendar days. It commences on the day after dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this peri-od has expired, a surcharge is possible, even if the deadline is not passed accord-ing to § 160 para. 3 GWB. An application for review would therefore have to be delivered to FAIR by the Public Procurement Tribunal before the expiry of the deadline according to § 134 GWB in order to prevent a surcharge. According to § 135 para. 1 and 2 GWB, the ineffectiveness of a commission can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 cal-endar days of the conclusion of the contract but not later than six months after the conclusion of the contract. If the contracting entity has published the award in Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union [transl.: Official Journal of the European Union], the period unenforceability shall end 30 calendar days after announce-ment of the publication of the award in Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection ORG-0003 neg-w-call false false 27/2600032013FAIR Accelerator Control System Engineering Support Development, production and delivery of specialised electronic software and few hardware for the control, data acquisition and monitoring of the accelerators. All these components need full software integration into the FAIR accelerator control system. Further, the services include upgrade of already existing operational systems. The services are expected to be delivered within a period of 24 months. For the construction of the first facility section of FAIR, special hardware and electronic components are required on the one hand, as well as support services for software integration into the accelerator's control system and beam diagnostic system. The hardware and software integration serves to ensure compatibility with the very complex and specific control system standards of the FAIR accelerator and is a main component of the scope of delivery. This includes the extension or development of so-called FESA classes with integrated LSA data supply by the accelerator control system as well as the connection to the campus-wide timing system based on a white-rabbit real-time network. In this context, special electronic and mechanical components are to be supplied, as well as programming and support services supplies #Bekanntmachungs-ID: CXS0YYEYT12VR44C# The evaluation of the offers will be proceeded according to price quotient method. 30% price / 70% criteria The criteria and other conditions are laid out in detail within the document "special application conditions" 42961000 30232700 31712110 38424000 48960000 72211000 72212960 Planckstr. 1 Darmstadt 64291 DE711 DEU Planckstraße 1 Darmstadt 64291 DE711 DEU LOT-0001 false false false no-eu-funds false poi-exa 30.00000000 price Price Consideration of the price through the valuation method "Preis-Quotient-Methode" poi-exa 35.00000000 quality Technical Concept Great care has to be taken that all proposed deliveries, i.e. devices and services, match exactly to the requirements as given in the technical specifications. Full coverage of all physical and logical interfaces has to be clearly demonstrated by the provider. Bidders have to describe their technical concept in such detail that it becomes doubtlessly demonstrated how the proposed solution will contribute to the fulfillment of the specification. It must also be described how the execution of joint development work for software, interfaces and integration is intended. It should be recognizable how many and which resources are provided for the real-ization of the project. Especially emphasized should be, a) if the proposed hardware solution passes the requirements for long term op-eration (10 month per year over 15-20 years lifetime). b) if good coordination methods apply for the interaction and collaboration be-tween the system core maintainers of the accelerator control system and beam instrumentation software application specialists c) the availability and planned use of resources with understanding of the under-lying accelerator physics, mathematical calculation methods (SVD, single value decomposition) and FPGA programming skills. d) the availability and planned use of resources with good technical understand-ing of the mode of operation of accelerator components and their technical char-acteristics, e.g., linear accelerator RF systems, pulsed power systems, ion source components, etc. The required documents are evaluated in terms of their level of detail, com-pleteness, comprehensiveness and relevance. A presentation that is well-written, coherent, and well-founded, and that reveals a concept that suggests good and efficient task performance, will be evaluated positively. poi-exa 24.50000000 quality Quality Assurance The quality assurance measures in general and the testing processes in the spe-cific production sequence are to be described. This also includes the description of early error detection mechanisms, as well as the recording of the specifications in the production process. It should become apparent how the measures con-tribute to the fulfillment of the specifications and how the technical characteris-tics are controlled and recorded. Besides completeness and level of detail it will be evaluated whether the de-scribed QA methods can detect errors at an early stage, limit them and elimi-nate them efficiently. The planned documentation of the tests is also included in the evaluation. poi-exa 10.50000000 quality Delivery Schedule Bidders shall submit their own delivery schedule with reference to the targeted contract period and with statements on the deliverability of the required work packages and components. It is particularly important to the client that the bidder specifies a reliable production and delivery time that is comprehensible to the client. A detailed description of the project planning will be evaluated positive-ly. The completeness and plausibility of the information provided will be evalu-ated. ORG-0001 The competent reviewing authority is Vergabekammer des Bundes [transl.: Federal Public Procurement Tribu-nal] Villemombler Straße 76 53123 Bonn Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Website: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html Candidate/ Bidder is requested to clearly identify those sections of the participa-tion application (and eventually of the tender, if applicable) that contain a trade or business secret. If Bidder fails to do so, the Public Procurement Tribunal may, in the case of a review procedure, assume that Bidder has agreed to have these documents inspected (§165 para. 3 GWB). As Awarding Authority, FAIR is obliged to make the tender file available to the Public Procurement Tribunal immediately when initiating a review procedure (§ 163 para. 2 cl. 3 GWB). Candidates/ Bidders have a right to expect the contracting authority's compliance with the Bidder-protecting provisions re: the tender procedure (§ 97 para. 6 GWB). If Candidate/ Bidder interested in the contract considers that Bidder's rights have been infringed through failure to comply with award regulations, the infringement must be reported to FAIR within ten calendar days (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 1 GWB). Infringements identifiable on the basis of the announcement or the award doc-uments must be asserted against FAIR within the deadline for submission of ap-plications (or tenders) specified in the announcement (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs Candidate/ Bidder that FAIR is unwilling to redress its complaint, it is possible to file an appeal for review with the aforementioned Public Procure-ment Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the notification (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 4 GWB). Bidders whose tenders are not to be considered for the award will be informed prior to the award according to § 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calendar days after this information has been sent by FAIR. In the case of trans-mission by fax or electronic means, this period shall be ten calendar days. It commences on the day after dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this peri-od has expired, a surcharge is possible, even if the deadline is not passed accord-ing to § 160 para. 3 GWB. An application for review would therefore have to be delivered to FAIR by the Public Procurement Tribunal before the expiry of the deadline according to § 134 GWB in order to prevent a surcharge. According to § 135 para. 1 and 2 GWB, the ineffectiveness of a commission can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 cal-endar days of the conclusion of the contract but not later than six months after the conclusion of the contract. If the contracting entity has published the award in Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union [transl.: Official Journal of the European Union], the period unenforceability shall end 30 calendar days after announce-ment of the publication of the award in Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection ORG-0003 true false none none 27/2600032013FAIR Accelerator Control System Engineering Support According to the detailed specifications, few hardware equipment and mechanical actuators have to be customized, manufactured and tested as well as in majority engineering and programming of specialized System Software has to be upgraded or newly designed. Also Support for Hardware and Software Integration into the FAIR systems is required. supplies soc-obj Im Rahmen der Sorgfaltspflicht für eine menschenrechtlich und umweltbezogene Lieferkette und dem damit verknüpften bei GSI/FAIR etablierten Beschwerdeverfahren wird ein nachhaltiges Produktionsverfahren gefördert. Auf die Einhaltung von gesetzlichem Mindestlohn wird geachtet. hum-right work-cond 42961000 30232700 31712110 38424000 48960000 72211000 72212960 Planckstr. 1 Darmstadt 64291 DE711 DEU Planckstraße 1 Darmstadt 64291 DE711 DEU 24 1 Foreseen contract period will be 24 month, but can be extended another 12 month 2000-01-01Z